Iraq-Iran-Syria

'Liberal Compromise' between occupiers and occupied, but will it sail?


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 02:44:46 AM EST

First here's the news from the Independent: one of the few (indeed, practically the only) British newspapers that has stood firmly against the invasion and occupation from the beginning.

'Iraq and the United States have finally agreed on a security pact which would mean that US forces would withdraw from Iraq by 2011, American and Iraqi officials said yesterday.

The accord became a major test of strength between the Iraqi government and Washington since negotiations began in March with the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, pictured below, demanding US concessions on the date of the troop withdrawal and immunity for US troops. The pact replaces the UN Security Council resolution enacted after the American invasion...The accord has been on the verge of being signed several times in the past only for fresh objections to be made by the Iraqi government, which has become increasingly confident of its own strength. A compromise has been reached on whether or not US troops can be tried by an Iraqi court if they commit crimes while not engaged in operations. US troops are to withdraw from Iraqi towns and villages by the middle of next year and from Iraq entirely by the middle of 2011 said the government's spokesman, Ali Dabbagh.

He said: "The withdrawal is to be achieved in three years. In 2011, the government at that time will determine whether it needs a new pact or not, and what type of pact will depend on the challenges it faces."

The US administration will present the pact as a sign of its success in Iraq but in fact the accord is very different from originally envisaged by Washington which would largely have continued the occupation as before.'

So far, so good. Or so it would seem.

(758 words in story) Full Story

The Empire Expands


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Sat Sep 13, 2008 at 05:58:18 AM EST

Pakistan was an important colony to the American Empire. Under the client king Musharraf the Americans could  'hold' (at least to a certain extent) the border with Afghanistan. Pakistan also borders, non-coincidentally, Iran.

So, given its strategic importance, it is unsurprising that the Americans fought the demands of the Pakistan people for democratic self-determination as long as possible.

Luckily the Pakistan people  fought hard against the Empire and eventually managed to get what they wanted: democracy. That's the good news.

(740 words in story) Full Story

Reverse the Polarities


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 at 01:52:24 AM EST

As always, simply 'reverse the polarities' of this story to see its significance.

'The Bush administration has conducted an extensive spying operation on Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki, his staff and others in his government, according to a new book by Washington Post editor and author Bob Woodward.

"We know everything he says," according to one of multiple sources Woodward cites about the practice in "The War Within: A Secret White House History 2006-2008."'

Now, just try to imagine how our 'free press' would have reacted if a foreign power:  

(841 words in story) Full Story

'US...thought to be making a decision within weeks to attack Iran '


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 11:08:50 AM EST

After all the problems with Georgia (or, to be more   specific, Georgia's problems with South Ossetia) I bet you all thought the  Iran situation had gone away, didn't you?

Hardly.  On the contrary. With a newly emboldened Russia, and increasing signs of Iranian-Russian cooperation it hardly seems likely that the Americans are going to ease off Persia, especially since the Americans' embarassing humiliation in Georgia.

So...this  story is interesting.

(352 words in story) Full Story

'Israel considers military option'


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 05:40:06 AM EST

'Israel is building up its strike capabilities amid growing anxiety over Iran's nuclear ambitions and appears confident that a military attack would cripple Tehran's atomic program, even if it can't destroy it.

Such talk could be more threat than reality. However, Iran's refusal to accept Western conditions is worrying Israel as is the perception that Washington now prefers diplomacy over confrontation with Tehran.

The Jewish state has purchased 90 F-16I fighter planes that can carry enough fuel to reach Iran, and will receive 11 more by the end of next year. It has bought two new Dolphin submarines from Germany reportedly capable of firing nuclear-armed warheads in addition to the three it already has.'

(1308 words in story) Full Story

Ambiguous Language


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 08:26:07 AM EST

'The U.S. called for additional ``punitive' measures against Iran, citing the government's failure to give a satisfactory response to an incentive package aimed at ending its nuclear program.'

(254 words in story) Full Story

Senate Tightens Sanctions in Iran


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 04:23:53 AM EST

'A new Iran sanctions bill cleared its key hurdle in the Senate Thursday, as Congress tries to tighten the financial screws on Teheran....

The Senate banking committee passed legislation sponsored by Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) and Ranking Member Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) which expands the scope of sanctions against those dealing with Iran to include financial institutions and insurers and those connected to facilitating the transport of Iranian energy products; penalizes foreign subsidiaries of US companies who conduct business with Iran; and makes it easier for pension and other funds to divest from companies benefiting the Iranian economy, among other measures.'

(286 words in story) Full Story

Red Light turns to Amber.


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Sun Jul 13, 2008 at 04:38:54 AM EST

'U.S. President George W. Bush has given Israel an "amber light" to begin preparations for a military attack on Iran, a Pentagon official told The Sunday Times this week.

"Amber means get on with your preparations, stand by for immediate attack and tell us when you're ready," the official said.

The official told the Times that Bush informed the Israeli government he would back an Israeli plan to strike Iran's main nuclear sites with long-range aerial weapons if diplomatic talks over Tehran's contentious atomic program broke down.'

(317 words in story) Full Story

Next 8 >>

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Iraq-Iran-Syria

Older Stories...

submit story | create account | faq | search