Pakistan


Scoop

By Hidari, Section News
Posted on Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 06:37:27 AM EST

Rushing off on holiday so don't have much time to comment on the news, but here's Juan Cole in Salon with apposite comments.

'The assassination of Benazir Bhutto on Thursday provoked rioting in Islamabad and Karachi, with her supporters blaming President Pervez Musharraf, while he pointed his finger at Muslim extremists. The renewed instability in Pakistan came as a grim reminder that the Bush administration has been pursuing a two-front war, neither of which has been going well. Bush's decision to put hundreds of billions of dollars into an Iraq imbroglio while slighting the effort to fight al-Qaida, rebuild Afghanistan, and move Pakistan toward democracy and a rule of law has been shown up as a desperate and unsuccessful gamble. The question is whether President Musharraf now most resembles the shah of Iran in 1978. That is, has his authority among the people collapsed irretrievably?'

'The Bush administration backed military dictator Musharraf to the hilt as a way of dealing with U.S. security and al-Qaida on the cheap while it poured hundreds of billions into Baghdad. George W. Bush was entirely willing to let the Pakistani judiciary, the rule of law, and any real democracy be gutted by an ambitious general. For Washington, allowing Bhutto to return to Pakistan was simply a way to shore up Musharraf's legitimacy. Now Pakistan faces new turmoil, and Bush appears to have no Plan B. Since Pakistan is a nuclear power and al-Qaida extremists still use it as a base to plot against the West, this failure is inexcusable and threatens U.S. security in a way Iraq never did.

Bhutto, the leader of the Pakistan People's Party, was leaning out of the sunroof of a car leaving a political rally on Thursday evening in Rawalpindi near the capital, Islamabad, when an armed assailant dressed as a policeman approached, shot her twice, and then detonated a belt bomb, killing her and some 22 other persons. When Bhutto's death was announced, rioting broke out in Rawalpindi and her home base, the southern port city of Karachi. Many of her supporters blamed Musharraf, who, though he recently resigned from the military, came to power in a 1999 military coup and has ruled as a military dictator. The house of a senior politician from the Pakistan Muslim League (Qaid-i Azam), Musharraf's party, was burned down by an angry mob. It is clear that many in the Pakistan People's Party blame Musharraf and his supporters for Bhutto's death, whether fairly or unfairly. If this sentiment becomes widespread, it is hard to see how Musharraf can survive.'

And yet, the US desperately needs Musharraf to keep Pakistan under US domination in order to safeguard the 'success story' of Afghanistan. And so, the paradox: Musharraf must go, but Musharraf can't go.

However, the key point at the moment is that Bush's plans to 'remake the middle east' now stand in ruins. This is, unfortunately, not wholly a good thing.

< The threat of war recedes...for the moment. | Propping up 'our' dictator. >

Tags: (all tags) :: Add Tags to this Story
Display: Sort:
Iraq (none / 0) (#1)
by Anonymous Hero on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 07:57:46 PM EST
  The war is spreading.  The british Historian Arnold Toynbee,  wrote years ago that the war of the coming century-this century would not be between Communism and capitalism but would be a war between Islam and Christianity.

[ Reply to This ]
Display: Sort:

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
submit story | create account | faq | search